The Global AI Regulation Movement: What It Means for Turkish Companies

Regulations are changing rapidly to encourage the development and application of AI in a way that is morally, openly, and responsibly as these technologies become more and more integrated into international commercial operations. Turkish companies are increasingly being influenced by international regulatory constraints that are influencing their compliance procedures and innovation initiatives, even though the country has not yet passed legally enforceable national legislation particularly pertaining to AI. The OECD Principles on AI, the European Union's AI Act, the US's NIST AI Risk Management Framework, and recently developed standards from countries like China are some of the well-known cross-border frameworks that are causing these pressures. In addition to analyzing the domestic policy environment and providing strategic adaptation advice, this study investigates the effects of these laws on Turkish companies.

The European Union's AI Act and Its Global Presence

The Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act), which was formally adopted in 2024, is one of the most extensive and significant legislative advancements in AI legislation. Social scoring systems and other AI systems judged to be of "unacceptable risk," which are strictly prohibited, are included in the risk-based, tiered classification system established by this rule. Strict regulations apply to "high-risk" AI systems employed in vital industries like infrastructure, healthcare, and law enforcement. On the other hand, "limited or minimal risk" systems just need the most fundamental transparency controls.

Because of the EU AI Act's extraterritorial nature, it applies to any corporation, regardless of location, that creates or implements AI systems that affect users in the EU. If the outputs of Turkish companies' AI services or products such as biometric verification tools, medical diagnostic software, or recruitment algorithm, are utilized in EU countries, they are required to abide by the Act. Now, businesses need to put in place thorough conformance assessments, human oversight procedures, high data quality requirements, and post-market monitoring systems. Turkish companies have a crucial window to match their data governance frameworks and product pipelines with EU standards because enforcement will be eased in over a two-year transition period.

OECD Guidelines: Regulating the Ethical Standard

Although they are not legally binding, the OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence are regarded as the gold standard for developing ethical AI, and Turkey endorsed them in 2019. In addition to human-centered values and fairness, these principles place a strong emphasis on accountability, robustness, security, and safety, as well as inclusive growth, sustainable development, and well-being. International businesses and governmental organizations are increasingly using these standards to assess the morality of AI systems. Following the OECD framework is a sign of legitimacy and a requirement for long-term cooperation for Turkish companies taking part in EU-funded initiatives, international tenders, or cross-border data collaborations.

Additionally, the OECD has started sector-specific guidelines. For example, in the finance industry, Turkish banks and fintechs are required to take into account AI governance components including risk-based client profiling and algorithmic bias. More alignment with these developing frameworks will help Turkish companies and authorities integrate into global digital value chains more readily.

U.S. NIST Framework: Risk Management

The United States has set significant standards through the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), despite not having enacted a complete federal AI law. Best practices for managing risks related to AI systems throughout their lifecycle are provided by the AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF), which was published in 2023. Mapping AI hazards, assessing risk, controlling and reducing risks, and ongoing development are essential elements. Alignment with NIST standards is quickly becoming the benchmark for Turkish companies that export technology to the United States or collaborate with American companies. A company's reputation and operational resilience are improved by using NIST-based practices, such as continuous testing, incident response procedures, and model documentation.

China's Evolving AI Law Framework

China has adopted a proactive approach to AI regulation, emphasizing user rights, content monitoring, and algorithm transparency. The Provisions on the Administration of Algorithmic Recommendation Services are one example of a regulatory measure that requires disclosure of algorithmic operations, user permission and opt-out procedures, and the avoidance of discrimination and manipulation. AI-specific regulations pertaining to deepfakes, autonomous vehicles, and face recognition have also been introduced by Chinese authorities. These regulations place a strong emphasis on cybersecurity, ethical behavior, and government supervision. Turkish companies that want to enter the Chinese digital market or deal with Chinese IT partners need to be aware of and adjust to these changing frameworks. The Chinese model provides insights into a state-driven strategy in which national security and political accountability are intimately linked to ethical AI.

G7 Hiroshima Principles and Transnational Harmony

The Hiroshima Principles for AI, published by the G7 in 2023, demonstrate a shared dedication to reliable AI. Although not legally enforceable, these principles provide a political framework that is highly compatible with EU and OECD values. The G7 promotes worldwide collaboration on AI safety and innovation, human oversight, openness and auditability, and the defense of fundamental rights. It will become more and more necessary for Turkish companies hoping to collaborate with businesses in the G7 to match their practices with these principles, particularly in fields like education, healthcare, and military.

Turkey's Internal Strategic and Regulatory Environment

Despite not having a specific, binding AI law, Turkey has established important frameworks for national plans and policies. Talent development, R&D incentives, international collaboration, and ethical values are the main focuses of the National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2021–2025. AI systems that handle personal data are subject to the Law on the Protection of Personal Data (KVKK), which requires security, data minimization, and user consent. The 2015–2018 Information Society Strategy and Action Plan promoted open-source, human-centered AI development in government agencies. Sectoral Co-Creation Laboratories are multi-stakeholder forums for evaluating the ethical, legal, and technical issues surrounding the application of AI.Turkey appears to be evolving toward a more organized regulatory approach that is influenced by worldwide standards but customized to local realities, according to recent updates, such as the 2024–2025 Action Plan released by the country's Digital Transformation Office.

Strategic Recommendations for Turkish Companies

Turkish companies need to be proactive rather than reactive in this changing environment. Establishing AI governance frameworks through internal committees or task forces in charge of ethics, data protection, and regulatory compliance is a crucial step in guaranteeing long-term compliance and competitiveness. To routinely assess AI systems for bias, security flaws, and data integrity, businesses should perform algorithmic audits. It is essential to increase transparency by using audit trails, explainable models, and explicit user documentation. Market acceptance will increase if product development and vendor selection are conducted in accordance with international standards by using OECD, NIST, and EU principles as benchmarks. Adherence to intricate regulatory standards can be streamlined by investing in compliance technologies, such as instruments for data lineage tracing, consent management, and automated reporting.

Conclusion

The global push to regulate AI is becoming an operational reality rather than a far-off trend. Turkish companies have to deal with a complex compliance environment that encompasses not just US and EU regulations but also new Chinese frameworks and global alliances like the G7. Within its borders, Turkey is stepping up its legislative and strategic initiatives, setting new standards for companies of all sizes. Turkish companies may reduce legal risks, build user and partner confidence, and establish themselves as reliable participants in the global digital economy by incorporating ethical AI concepts into their operations. Awareness and action are the first steps on the path to AI maturity, which calls for a delicate balancing act between innovation, regulation, and ethical responsibility.

References

• Esin Attorney Partnership. (2024). Yapay Zeka Stratejisine İlişkin 2024-2025 Eylem Planı Yayımlandı. https://www.esin.av.tr/tr/2024/07/30/yapay-zeka-stratejisine-iliskin-2024-2025-eylem-plani-yayimlandi/
• European Commission. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Act. https://ec.europa.eu
• G7 Hiroshima Principles on AI. (2023). G7 Digital and Tech Ministers' Declaration
• Gün + Partners. (2024). Türkiye'de Yapay Zekanın Düzenlenmesine İlişkin Gelişmeler. https://gun.av.tr/tr/goruslerimiz/makaleler/turkiye-de-yapay-zekanin-duzenlenmesine-iliskin-gelismeler
• Harvey Arasan. (2024). Yapay Zeka ile İlgili Hukuki Düzenlemeler ve Gelişmeler. https://harveyarasan.com/yapay-zeka-ile-ilgili-hukuki-duzenlemeler-ve-gelismeler/
• Kabine Law. (2024). Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zeka Yasası. https://www.kabinelaw.com/tr/avrupa-birligi-yapay-zeka-yasasi/
• Lexology. (2024). AI Regulatory Update Including EU and OECD Developments. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=046278d3-272b-416f-891f-a428b750e401
• Lexology. (2024). China’s Regulatory Framework for Artificial Intelligence. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4f6a176f-63d6-418b-9406-c0e79b012a1b
• Lexology. (2024). Global AI Regulatory Landscape and Emerging Trends. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c6dcc047-3746-4b93-a129-2ec056f8e57d
• NIST. (2023). AI Risk Management Framework. https://www.nist.gov/ai
• OECD. (2019). OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence. https://oecd.ai
• Pekin & Pekin. (2024). Legal Developments on Artificial Intelligence in 2024. https://pekin.com.tr/2024/11/25/legal-developments-on-artificial-intelligence-in-2024/
• Republic of Turkey Ministry of Industry and Technology. (2021). National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2021 to 2025
• Tevetoğlu Legal. (2024). OECD’nin Finans Sektöründe Yapay Zekâya İlişkin Düzenleyici Yaklaşımlar Raporu Üzerine İnceleme. https://www.tevetoglu.av.tr/tr/yayinlarimiz/oecdnin-finans-sektorunde-yapay-zekaya-iliskin-duzenleyici-yaklasimlar-raporu-uzerine-inceleme-2024-09-21-193407
• White & Case. (2024). European Parliament Adopts Artificial Intelligence Act. https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/european-parliament-adopts-artificial-intelligence-act
• White & Case. (2025). AI Watch: Global Regulatory Tracker – OECD. https://www.whitecase.com/insight-our-thinking/ai-watch-global-regulatory-tracker-oecd