Menu

    An Overall Evaluation After the Appeal Decisions in the UK, EPO and in Australia on DABUS Applications

    Human or Non-human Remains the Question for Designating AI (Based Machine) As Inventor. An Overall Evaluation After the Appeal Decisions in the UK, EPO and in Australia on DABUS Applications

    It will be recalled that, in the subject applications, the applicant, Dr. Thaler has designated AI (DABUS) as inventor and claimed that he derived the “right to the patent by virtue of being its creator and owner”. The applicant asserted that the “inventions had been created autonomously” as DABUS, the so-called, “the creativity machine,” “produces new ideas and mimics the human brain’s major cognitive circuit: the thalamocortical loop.”


    To read this article and discover more pleaseregister for free
    This website is available “as is.” Turkish Law Blog is not responsible for any actions (or lack thereof) taken as a result of relying on or in any way using information contained in this website, and in no event shall they be liable for any loss or damages.