The Electrolux - BSH Decision of the CJEU: The Next Step for Jurisdiction in European and Global Patent Infringement Cases

On February 25, 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rendered a groundbreaking judgment in the patent infringement case between BSH Hausgeräte GmbH and Electrolux AB, marking a significant ruling not only in Europe but worldwide. This decision is expected to pave the way for the expansion of jurisdiction in patent cases in EU member states and increase competition among courts in the international arena.

The dispute was brought before the CJEU as a preliminary ruling procedure and concern a patent infringement action filed by BSH against Electrolux before a Swedish domestic court. In this infringement action, BSH alleged that Electrolux infringed national parts of a European patent relating to vacuum cleaner technology that had been validated in various European Union (EU) member states, including Sweden, and in Türkiye.

In defense, Electrolux claimed that the relevant patent was invalid and argued that, in infringement actions where patent invalidity is asserted as a defense, infringement and invalidity cannot be dissociated and that the courts of the states and Türkiye in which those patents are validated have exclusive jurisdiction over the dispute. The Swedish domestic court, in its decision dated December 21, 2020, ruled that it lacked jurisdiction over the patent infringement proceedings concerning the national patents in other EU Member States and in Türkiye which were obtained by validating the European Patent

BSH appealed this decision before the Swedish Court of Appeal, claiming that the Swedish courts would also have jurisdiction over infringement proceedings relating to national patents validated in other EU Member States and also in Türkiye. The Swedish Court of Appeal requested a preliminary ruling from the CJEU on whether the Swedish courts would have jurisdiction in a dispute concerning the infringement of validations of a European patent in the Member States and in Türkiye.

In its judgment dated February 25, 2025, the CJEU determined that the court of the EU Member State in which the defendant is domiciled has jurisdiction to hear a patent infringement action concerning a patent granted in another EU Member State or in a state other than an EU Member State, even if the defendant challenges the validity of the patent subject to that action. In this context, the CJEU's rendering enables infringement actions in relation to validated European patents, and which have entered the national phase in Türkiye, to be brought before the courts of EU Member States, if the defendant has a domicile in that EU Member State.

As a result, it is predicted that this decision of the CJEU will provide patent owners with a wider range of options regarding the choice of jurisdiction in multi-national patent disputes, leading to competition among states and will fundamentally change the strategies for international patent litigation.

First published by Legalink Newsletter in Mar 24, 2025.