The ESG Framework: Key to Sustainable Business

I. Introduction

The ESG approach is primarily concerned with assessing a business's overall rating in terms of its sensitivity to environmental (“E”), social (“S”), and governance (“G”) factors. These principles represent the core tenets of ESG. The term is currently in general use within the field of investment. Furthermore, it is essential to acknowledge that not only are investors becoming increasingly aware of ESG, but consumers are also becoming more aware of it. In this context, it should not be forgotten that ESG also means measuring sustainability and managing risks.

II. Importance of ESG for Companies

There are many reasons why ESG is a crucial point for any company. The first perspective concerns environmental risk management, social dilemmas, and unexpected governance problems. ESG provides a framework for companies to effectively identify, assess, and manage the risks they face. This provides to enhance their flexibility and resilience in the face of potential risks. It is becoming more critical to consider the growing tendency of consumers to behave in an environmentally friendly and socially aware way. Another crucial point is sustainability. Businesses may develop strategies for long-term success and a predictable future by implementing these principles. Environmental sustainability is supported by reducing gas emissions and fighting climate change. In addition to the low cost of capital, financial performance can be supported by trusted partnerships and company policies.

III. Environmental Practices

These factors are essentially concerned with the general approach of organizations' policies regarding environmental issues. Understanding carbon footprints and utilizing renewable energy sources are vital in combating climate change. To achieve a sustainable environment, effective waste management and reducing greenhouse gas emissions are essential, as they are connected to deforestation and biodiversity. Furthermore, an organization's approach and response to potential situations are essential and will be shaped by risk management.

IV. Social Practices

The following points will be explained in detail, providing insight into the fundamental aspects of an organization's relationship with key stakeholders, employees, and consumers. In order to enhance their social practices score, organizations must consider the impact they have on these three key actors. The protection of consumers against unforeseen errors and participation in social responsibility projects can lead to the development of a relationship with consumers. Diversity is of critical importance in relation to the organizational structure. Potential areas of diversity include, but are not limited to, factors such as educational background, nationality, age, religion, culture, and disability. However, one of the most essential diversity and equality might be gender equality. The improved relationship between employees is a key factor in providing a healthy and supportive work environment. Lastly, being sensitive to human rights and ensuring data protection is crucial for both sides of the relationship.

V. Governance Practices

This subject can be defined as the policies and procedures of an organization. In the context of relations with stakeholders, the rights of stakeholders and the board's management have a significant impact. Moreover, organizations must demonstrate sufficient transparency to inspire trust in practice areas. Due to the nature of law, regulations are rapidly changing. Compliance with regulations is crucial, although regulations are changing rapidly. Awareness of ethical practices is growing, and in light of this data, ethical practices are considered more important. The process of reducing and managing conflicts of interest tends to have an impact on risk management policies. Furthermore, for ensuring governmental stability and predictability, risk management is crucial.

VI. ESG Metrics & Performance and Reporting

ESG metrics mention performance factors that affect the efficiency of ESG. For “E”, examples include gas emissions and the fight against climate change. For “S”, examples include diversity and social responsibility projects. For “G”, an example includes transparency. Moreover, other general factors also exist. Code of ethics, carbon emission usage plans, and employee safety plans are examples of general factors. These metrics can be classified into two categories: qualitative and quantitative. Quantitative metrics are defined as those that can be expressed in numerical form, such as emission records. Qualitative metrics are referred to as those that cannot be counted, such as risk management plans. ESG metrics are used to report on ESG efficiency, which is referred to as ESG reporting. There is no universally mandatory ESG framework for ESG reports. However, organizations tend to choose frameworks that are compatible with their organizational structure and reporting requirements. These reports provide a general observation of the organization’s sustainability status and obstacles in meeting sustainability goals. Furthermore, this will provide transparency for all parties regarding the organization’s predictability and risk management strategies. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), the Global Reporting Initiative Standards (GRI), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosure (TCDF), the Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB), and the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) are the most used frameworks for reporting. Yet, there are no mandatory frameworks; there are certain regulations that impact the development of frameworks. These regulations typically focus on providing compliance with European regulations. The SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) is a regulatory framework that pertains to the transparency of sustainable investment.

VII. ESG Scoring

ESG scoring is a general measurement of companies ranked by third-party organizations in light of ESG metrics, as previously mentioned. As with ESG frameworks, there is not a single methodology. Different third-party scoring companies use different methods, and there are also different scoring systems. However, in general, companies generally use a scale from 0 to 100. A score above 70 is considered good, and a score below 50 is considered poor. ESG score ensures an insight for investors to consider when investing in a sustainable and low-risk way. It is also important to note that as consumer awareness of eco-friendly and sustainable organizations increases. As a result of these developments, consumer behavior has become increasingly influenced by these factors. While there is no mandatory scoring organization, there are several common organizations that rank ESG, including Bloomberg, MSCI ESG Research, Sustainalytics, Refinitiv (Thomson Reuters), S&P Global, CDP Scores, and FTSE Russell.

VIII. ESG Challenges

a) Gathering Sufficient and Qualified Data

Sufficient and qualified data is essential for reporting to understand and manage the ongoing effects and potential risks in the future. This might be challenging to collect this data due to inadequate opportunities. Inadequate data inevitably results in poor risk management decisions. This will lead to a significant waste of time and resources. Providing accurate and consistent complex data is essential. If companies cannot collect this data internally, these companies should solve with external partners.

b) Fully Integrated Management

All companies must adopt ESG policies and regulations not only for external operations but also for internal operations to achieve a more sustainable future. Employees, stakeholders, and managers must integrate all of the principles. Integrating principles into operational planning, financial objectives, employee policies, and strategic plans. An ESG-friendly ecosystem can only be established with these principles. It is critical that all stakeholders and organizations involved in the company adopt this ecosystem and align their principles with it.

c) Multiple Framework Standards

As previously stated, there is no universally accepted framework for reporting. This implies that different countries may require reports with disparate frameworks, particularly for multinational organizations. The various frameworks differ in their respective priorities. As a result, the standardization of a report is a challenging endeavor. Furthermore, the lack of standardization makes a comparison between companies challenging, as multiple frameworks may apply, each with its own approach to environmental, social, and governance factors. In light of these challenges, it is advisable for companies to select the most appropriate framework in accordance with their operational areas.

d) Compliance With Complex Regulations

Regulations are evolving at a rapid pace. In this evolution, regulation’s complexity is increasing in various sectors. It might be extremely challenging to provide compliance with the complex regulations for some businesses. It is important to remember that any potential violation of regulations could result in significant financial losses. It would be beneficial for companies to be careful about the evolving regulations.

e) Supply Chain Management (SCM)

Supply chain management (SCM) means that as the complete process of a product, from the initial raw materials stage to the finished products. Such a factor might have great consequences due to its general effects. Effective planning, reduced risk exposure, improved monitoring, and greater customer satisfaction can result from improved supply chain management. A significant challenge may be related to the data that can be collected from this chain. A proactive approach to understanding and planning for potential risks is crucial to ensure long-term sustainability.

f) Understanding the ESG

It might be challenging for some companies to understand and analyze the importance and results of ESG. The significance of this problem might be disregarded or misunderstood. A holistic approach would be beneficial for companies. Companies must adopt and integrate factors into the fabric of their organizational structure. A realistic aim and plan can only be successful by understanding the roots of principles, not repeating them.

g) Insufficient Risk Management

Risk management is linked with lots of other factors. It is difficult to consider this challenge alone, as it is likely to be influenced by many other challenges. However, it can be summarized as follows: Insufficient risk management is probably the cause of bad results, or insufficient risk management might result from other bad decisions. Therefore, this challenge should be considered in a broader perspective. In summary, risk management can be defined as the company's ability to identify, assess, and mitigate potential risks in order to reduce their impact on the company.

IX. Conclusion

The significance of ESG has been growing over recent years. The significance of ESG is becoming increasingly recognized, with companies placing greater emphasis on its positive implications. Despite its slowness, organizations are developing ESG frameworks and related regulations. The number of companies ranked by organizations is increasing. Due to rising awareness of environmental, social, and governance issues among investors and consumers, the financial impact of consumer behaviors is becoming visible. However, companies do not seem to be compliant with these developments. Nevertheless, there seems to be a tendency to act similarly to ESG. It should be noted that the listed companies above are generally listed. However, there can be listed more specifically in every different sector. Each sector may require specific challenges due to its particular characteristics.

References

- ESG Metrics: Definition & Examples | Blogs | Novisto. (2024, July 8). Novisto. https://novisto.com/resources/blogs/understanding-esg-metrics-definition-examples#:~:text=When%20we%20talk%20about%20ESG,company's%20operating%20performance%20and%20risk.

- Farmer, D. (2024, July 29). 5 top ESG reporting challenges and how to overcome them. Sustainability and ESG. https://www.techtarget.com/sustainability/tip/Top-ESG-reporting-challenges-and-how-to-overcome-them

- Hayes, A. (2023a, July 27). How to tell if a company has high ESG scores. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/company-esg-score-7480372#toc-what-do-esg-scores-measure

- Hutchison, R. (2024, August 6). ESG’s impact on supply chains: What to expect in 2024. Sedex. https://www.sedex.com/blog/esgs-impact-on-supply-chains-what-to-expect-in-2024/

- Jangra, M. (n.d.). The 5 biggest ESG challenges facing businesses and manufacturers globally. | Rural Handmade-Redefine Supply to Build Sustainable Brands. https://ruralhandmade.com/blog/the-5-biggest-esg-challenges-facing-businesses-and

- Lennie, K. (2024, July 18). ESG reporting: What are the challenges and opportunities faced by organizations in driving change? - The Global Treasurer. The Global Treasurer. https://www.theglobaltreasurer.com/2024/07/19/better-esg-reporting-an-important-step-in-driving-change/

- Mathis, S., & Stedman, C. (2024, August 14). What is ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance)? WhatIs. https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/environmental-social-and-governance-ESG

- Newman, G. (2024, March 26). Top 6 ESG issues for companies to tackle. Ethics & Compliance Initiative. https://www.ethics.org/top-6-esg-issues-for-companies-to-tackle/

- Weyten, S. (2023, October 24). ESG Reporting: 7 Key Challenges Organizations Face | Sparkle. Sparkle. https://sparkle.consulting/7-key-challenges-esg-reporting-challenge/

- What are ESG Frameworks? | IBM. (n.d.). https://www.ibm.com/topics/esg-frameworks

- What are ESG metrics? Top ESG metrics to know | Quantive. (n.d.). https://quantive.com/resources/articles/esg-metrics

- Yasar, K. (2024, August 7). 5 ESG benefits for businesses. WhatIs. https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/5-ESG-benefits-for-businesses