Menu

    Lawyers İsmail G. Esin

    Ismail Esin has experience advising clients in arbitration, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, privatization and real estate matters. He is ranked by leading publications for his experience in mergers and acquisitions, commercial arbitration and commercial litigation and has written extensively on these topics. He has also lectured on real estate law, law of obligations and mergers and acquisitions law at Marmara, Galatasaray and Bilgi Universities and currently lectures at Yeditepe University on mergers and acquisitions. Dr. Esin advises banks, multinational companies, governments and private equity funds on investments and major projects in Turkey, the Middle East and the CIS. His work focuses primarily on the retail, energy, infrastructure, construction, telecommunications, real estate and healthcare industries.

     

    Practice Areas & Work Department

    Real Estate

    Mergers & Acquisitions

    Private Equity

    Dispute Resolution

     

    Languages

    Turkish

    English

     

    Memberships

    Admitted to Istanbul Bar, 1998.

    Esin Arbitration Quarterly

    It is time to take a look back at the first months of 2023 and digest the recent updates and developments happening in the world of international arbitration. Recent court decisions present the new trends and shed light to the future of international arbitration.
    İsmail G. Esin

    Arbitration Quarterly

    As we enter the last quarter of 2022, changes and developments continue to occur in the world of international arbitration. On one hand, jurisprudence on the different aspects of international arbitration is expanding with the decisions of arbitral tribunals and courts. On the other hand, remarkable developments are occurring with regards to investment arbitration especially due to the monumental changes regarding the protection of energy investments.
    İsmail G. Esin

    New Decision by the Court of Cassation General Assembly to Unify the Conflicting Judgments

    There were conflicting opinions among various chambers of the Court of Cassation as to whether the statement of claim for the actions for the annulment of objections to the execution proceedings should be served to the attorney or the debtor. This conclusion reached in the Decision of the Board of the Unification of Case Law resolved the contradictions. Accordingly, even if the debtor against whom an execution proceeding is initiated objects to the execution proceeding through their attorney, in the action for annulment of the objection to be filed by the creditor, the statement of claim must be served to the principal (the debtor).
    İsmail G. Esin